Round table
October 18, 2002
Center for the Study of Democracy
On October 18, 2002,
a discussion on the Anti-Corruption in Bulgaria: the Role of
Judiciary and the Law Enforcement Institutions was held in the
Center for the Study of Democracy.
Ms. Eva Joly,
investigating magistrate who is worldwide recognized for her
outstanding contribution to the fight against corruption in France,
Mr. Anton Stankov, Minister of Justice of Bulgaria, Ms. Nelly
Koutzkova, Chair of Sofia District Court, Gen. Boyko Borissov,
Secretary General of the Ministry of Interior and Mr. Christo
Manchev, Deputy Prosecutor General presented their views and
discussed the topic with Bulgarian government officials, law
enforcement agencies officers, judges, prosecutors, investigators
and representatives of non-governmental organizations participating
in the Coalition 2000 anti-corruption process and the
Judicial Reform Initiative.
In his speech
Minister Stankov stressed on the necessity to amend the
Constitution as far as the prosecutors' immunity is concerned
because the magistrates do not need immunity but rather better work
conditions and better remuneration. Such amendment will also
provide for a greater transparency in the work of the
judiciary.
In her speech Ms.
Joly pointed out that the fight against corruption and money
laundering was very difficult in all countries, not only in recent
new democracies, but also in countries with old democracies and
stable institutions like France, Italy and even Norway, because all
criminal law systems since the Code of Hammurabi were built up to
track thieves and were not oriented towards the elite. The
testimony which is very important in the American, the Anglo-Saxon
and the Roman law was made to tell: "I saw the thief stealing"
while in the economic crimes there are not testimonies nor
witnesses because it is a secret, hidden criminality.
That is why it is indispensable to inverse the
burden of the proof in economic offence matters, Ms. Joly added. At
present the French prosecutors only have to prove that one person
is related to organized crime. If this is proven, the person has to
explain where the money comes from. In Ms. Joly's opinion, if
France is able to do that so should Bulgaria. This would mean that
if one person is suspected of corruption or any other economic
crime s/he should be able to explain where the money comes from and
this will make prosecution much easier.
Judge Joly also focused on the image of Bulgaria as
to economic crime. Bulgaria has signed the OECD Convention on
Fighting Bribery of Foreign Officials in Transnational Business
Transactions and has adopted new laws, correspondent to the
European legislation, but it is also true that implementation of
these laws is not good enough. It is also known from the work that
is being done by the Center for the Study of Democracy and
Coalition 2000 that the perception of the problem is very
important and the majority of the Bulgarians think that they live
in a very corrupt country. International investors would not take
their decisions based on these numbers but would ask for the
opinion of the international business community, i.e. Bulgaria has
an important problem with its image and it has to do even more to
demonstrate that it fights against corruption and is becoming a
transparent country.
Ms. Joly suggested that in order for Bulgaria to
prove that it is doing something against corruption it has to do
something important for the judicial system. The first thing is to
improve the budget of the judicial system because at present it is
only 1/10 of the budget of the judiciary in the European
member-states. With this very little budget allocated to the
justice they are not capable of carrying out difficult cases. It is
also important to have competent police making the investigation,
good prosecutors and good judges because it does not make sense to
have good investigations if one cannot rely on the judges at the
end. In conclusion Ms. Joly said that more transparency, more means
to the justice and one new law making the proof of economic crime
easier are needed and all these measures could be done at once
because they are not expensive but would make life easier for the
Bulgarian prosecutors.
Mr. Christo Manchev presented the position of the
General Prosecutor's Office dwelling on the possibility to
investigate ministers, state officials and magistrates who have
committed crimes related to corruption. Mr. Manchev reminded that
in the last two years the Prosecution of Cassation has investigated
11 ministers, among them 3 deputy prime ministers. Accusations
against 6 of these persons have been submitted to the courts as
well as against 7 deputy ministers and 3 MPs.
In her speech Ms. Nelly Koutzkova insisted on
prevention measures to counter corruption. She suggested the
introduction of competition for selecting magistrates in order to
ensure that people who are too close to the executive power would
not be admitted to the judiciary. Ms. Koutzkova also suggested the
establishment of a court for magistrates and an internal unit to
investigate corruption within the judiciary.
Mr. Boyko Borissov emphasized on the good
cooperation between the police, the prosecution and the
investigation in the last several months. But he also admitted that
most of the units within the Ministry of Interior are still
affected by corruption practices.
See the
agenda
Speech of Judge
Eva Joly
See Media
Coverage of the Discussion (Available in Bulgarian
Only)
Judge Eva Joly
(biographical data)
Eva Joly has been an investigating magistrate in
France for seven years. Her legal career started as an assistant to
the public prosecutor in the town of Orleans. After working for a
time in the ministry of finance where she handled bankruptcies,
Joly rejoined the magistrature, focusing on financial crime. She
started investigating high-profile cases such as the state-owned
Credit Lyonnais, which had incurred staggering losses of billions
of dollars through mismanagement.
Joly is seen as the leader of a new breed
of judges who have not been afraid of calling to account crooked
businessmen and the French political elite. Her team has questioned
more than 100 former or serving members of parliament or mayors,
six former or current leaders of political parties, and a quarter
of the heads of the 40 biggest companies. The number of convictions
is still fairly small but includes big players like Pierre Suard,
the former head of Alcatel, plus a former Socialist minister, a
former Socialist party leader and two former Gaullist
mayors.
Her rise to media notoriety began at 6 a.m. on a
June morning in 1994 when she ordered the police to enter the Paris
premises of Bernard Tapie, business tycoon and cabinet minister
under Francois Mitterand, and drag him for questioning with his
hands cuffed. It was the first time ever a former minister of the
French Republic had received such treatment (Tapie was eventually
sentenced to six months in prison on fraud charges).
During the seven-year case against the Elf Aquitaine oil company
Eva Joly investigated the former Minister of Foreign Affairs and
President of the Constitutional Council (which is the Supreme Court
in the country) Roland Dumas for million- dollars abuses. Her team
of magistrates has initiated investigations against 30 former
ministers and government officials, including the former prime
minister of France Alain Juppe.
|