Two years after the adoption of the
Privatization Law, even if slowly, privatization in Bulgaria has
made considerable progress. It is expressed in the concluded over
328 transactions (of which 170 involving state-owned enterprises,
and 158 - municipal ones) and total revenues from privatization
exceeding BLV 1,300m. Privatization procedures have been instituted
for about 500 enterprises. One of its chief goals, along with the
withdrawal of the state from the management of the economy on a
microeconomic level, is for the enterprises to be restructured and,
once they have acquired real owners, for their activity to be based
on the principles of competition and the market.
The different privatization methods provide
different ways of achieving those objectives. The capital (market)
privatization favored by Bulgarian legislation is still the
dominating privatization method. One of its unquestionable
advantages is the speedy restructuring and adjustment of the
privatized enterprises owing to the presence of a real
owner-entrepreneur and the ensuing more efficient management
system. The effect of privatization is ultimately to be sought in
the activity of the enterprises and their economic state following
denationalization.
The study of 5 privatized enterprises was to
examine the effect of privatization on their general economic and
financial state - the restructuring of their business activity,
market positions (suppliers and clients), technological
restructuring, change of management system, the workforce and the
development of employment, the system of remuneration, crediting,
and the final financial results. The aim of the present paper is,
by covering all of the above problems, to summarize the principal
problems and achievements of the privatized enterprises and make
certain recommendations with respect to privatization
policy.
The analysis of the post-privatization
development and state of enterprises subject to transactions under
the provisions of the Privatization Law is to be regarded as a
provisional attempt to outline and assess emerging general
tendencies. The non-final and incomplete nature of the assessments,
as well as their provisional character, are accounted for by the
following circumstances:
First, the relatively short period
subject to analysis and evaluation.
Second, the relatively small number
of cases available for analysis, owing to the limited scope of the
privatization process.
Third, the insufficient
representativeness of the enterprises under consideration owing to
the uneven progress of the privatization process by sectors and
types of enterprises and activities.
Notwithstanding these reservations, there do
seem to be enough data about the post-privatization state and
development of the enterprises to formulate certain general
conclusions.
The analysis covers five case studies. They
have been selected on a typological principle. The enterprises were
privatized about a year ago and it is thus possible to assess their
operation before and after privatization. The cases have been
chosen to include the three basic types of towns - the capital - 1,
large towns - 3, small towns - 2. Insofar as the Privatization Law
provides opportunities for the use of various techniques, the study
covers cases of implementation of different privatization
techniques. The aim is to consider the extent to which the
privatization technique predetermines the functioning of the
already privatized enterprise. The cases under study include
enterprises privatized by the three groups of authorities under
Art. 3 of the Privatization Law - the Privatization Agency, the
Ministry of Trade and the Ministry of Industry, and the
municipalities of Gotse Delchev and Dimitrovgrad.
It is to be noted that two of the cases are
from the sector of trade, which is accounted for by the fact that
the largest number of privatization transactions have been
concluded in this sector.
In addition to the five comprehensive case
studies, the specific conclusions and assessments are also based on
information about post-privatization state and development of
another 10-12 enterprise, largely in the sphere of services and
trade. Even if fragmentary, this information reveals certain common
characteristics of specific aspects of their activity. They confirm
some of the tendencies indicated by the basic case
studies.
The case studies were conducted through a
questionnaire elaborated in advance, which makes it possible to
draw comparisons and to outline the common tendencies.
|